Questions and Answers October 2023

Questions and Answers October 2023

1) Jitendra Yadav, Jhansi,UP 

Question: Booking of land cancelled ,Refund of money paid to Builder 

Facts: Agreed to sell document signed .Before registration terms were objected to and refused to register. Total money paid Rs 2, 96.000/-in instalments (1000 +99000/on -+96132/-)

Answer: If agreement not signed, no terms agreed .In case agreement as per law is to be necessary to registered, it is considered not signed .In the matter of immovable property, agreement getting registered is mandatory 

Law on the point:

How buyer has right to cancel the booking; as per agreement 

  • Buyer can cancel the booking within the stipulated time frame of one month from the receipt of the Unregistered Agreement for Sale (Plot) dated14/07/2023
  • That the agreement between the Promoter and the Allottee becomes

binding only after the Allottee signs and delivers the Agreement along with the necessary schedules and payments within 30 days from the date of receipt

  • That Draft agreement is not submitted with allottees appearance for registration before the Sub-Registrar is also an integral part of this process. This process as per clause 20 of draft agreement is not completed ,hence there is no agreement between the parties  Reasons quoted 
  • Promoter has also not taken initiative to get the document registered to make it complete contract ,hence the application of the Allottee shall be treated as cancelled as per draft agreement clause 20 &22
  • The sums deposited by the Allottee, including the booking amount, are to be returned without interest or compensation.

Reasons for cancelling the deal: Legal issues

  • Not following the mandatory provisions of The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate (Regulation and Development) (Agreement for Sale) Rules, 2018 of RERA Act 2016 and crucial sections such as “21. Entire Agreement” have been omitted. 
  •  Non Encumbrances Certificate and a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from relevant authority not received failing which no bank approves loan 
  • Land shown mortgaged to HDFC bank and for this reason required permission from bank not on record
  • The verbal assurances provided by the Promoter’s representatives, differ significantly from the terms outlined in the Agreement for Sale (Plot). Such as demand for 90%payment without NOC and Non Encumbrances Certificate

Status of Contract 

No complete agreement duly registered with sub registrar exists .It is just an offer /proposal but no acceptance to the contractual agreement before the eyes of law .It is a case of given money for the purpose of a contract which is incomplete and receiver of money is under debt to the homebuyer to return the money with interest and compensation for breach of contract leading to misrepresentation to the home buyer and wasting time, energy and other opportunities 

2) Shubh Yadav 8726980953

Question: Can I go to High court for execution of consumer court order when appeal to state commission filed by OP?

Facts: Truck on loan, One month instalment not paid .Bank recovered vehicle and sold in auction. TRUCK not transferred as yet to buyer 

Filed consumer copmplaint, OP did not appear, ex party order in favour of complainant. Execution stage Now OP goes in appeal. Can I go to HC for execution, let appeal go on in state commission 

Answer: After appeal is filed execution shall be stayed .Court may order the lower commission to hear the case on merits and send back to the District commission for trial. High court has no jurisdiction to enter into the matter .In some cases where execution by revenue department is delayed, HC in writ has ordered to speed up execution but not in cases of appeal. 

3) Aniket Faridabad Haryana Ph. 8930284670

Question: phone got physically damaged, hence got repaired on my own cost during warranty can I ask for repair even out of warranty status  

Now phone not working properly and service centre refused to repair 2-3 times .And now it has gone out of warranty, can I ask for repair even out of warranty status 

Answer: Terms of warranty are important to understand .Generally during warranty period if someone other than authorised centre opens or repairs your product ,warranty does not work .But if the service centre has done repair ,you can always ask for repair .In your case product is damaged with your own fault ,there can be a problem .But law is if your complaint has been made during warranty and yet not repaired ,even after warranty lapses ,it is continuing cause of action . 

4) Advocate :Raj Jain

Question: Can the LIC policy be questioned under section 45 of Insurance act after revival of policy by paying missed premium?

Facts: Fathers’LIC policy dated28.10.2016.Premium missed Revival on 16.7.2020 after proper health check-up again .Policy holder died on 18.2.2021.Three year period not completed. After revival, heart treatment .Claim rejected for Non-disclosure .Death not due to heart attack 

Answer:

Two questions involved –

  • Within three years ,can company cancel the policy ?YES Section 45 (2) A policy can be called  in question at any time within three years from the date of commencement of the policy or the date of revival of the policy or from the date of rider of the policy…..

But it should be communicated in writing to insured about the reason and decision and opportunity to explain  

  • If cause of death is not the non-disclosure of material fact ,in your case heart attack ,you need to specifically disclose with evidence the cause of death and prove facts so not disclosed are not “material’ in your case

5) Abhishek Singh Rathore Pune 

Question: Can my vehicle be changed or refund in case of feature missing?

Facts: Purchase of car from Tata Motors May 2023 .In July I realised one feature missing which was mentioned in Brochure (Dual function of DRL with indicator) when contacted showroom, stating this feature is meant for upper model and not in your model other complications also could not be repaired

Answer: If brochure confirms your version, they have to provide you feature if possible to be done .In case it is not possible and you are provided a model which is not having feature as promised, you are entitled to change car or refund.

Other complications if can be repaired, change part, everything must be tried .In case no repair possible in spite of change of parts, vehicle to be changed

Supreme Court Rejects Liability order against Railways for Theft on Trains

Supreme Court Rejects Liability order against Railways for Theft on Trains

Supreme Court Rejects Liability order against Railways for Theft on Trains

In a case before the Supreme Court against Railways, it was held that the theft cannot be considered a deficiency in the Railway’s service. The Court ruled that if a passenger is unable to protect their belongings, the Railways cannot be held responsible. However, it does not necessarily mean that Railways are exempt from responsibility in all theft cases. This ruling sets a precedent, but each future case will be assessed independently based on its specific circumstances and evidence.

Dr Prem Lata, Legal Head VOICE

Case Title: Station Superintendent &Others V/S Surender Bhola, Civil Appel No 7116 of 2017 decided on 15.6.2023. 

On 15th June 2023, the Supreme Court found merit in the Railway’s arguments that they were not accountable for the theft of Rs. one lakh belonging to Surender Bhola, the consumer who had filed a complaint before consumer commission. The complainant stated that the cash was in a belt tied around his waist and was stolen while he was travelling on the train. The District Consumer Forum had initially ruled in favour of the complainant, awarding him one lakh rupees, and this decision was upheld by both the State and National Commission.

However, despite the decisions in favour of the complainant at lower levels, no one represented the complainant’s case before the Supreme Court for six years. As a result, the Supreme Court held that Railways cannot be held responsible for the theft.

Law on the point

Each case is unique, with its own set of facts and circumstances, and any court decision is contingent upon these specific details and the relevant laws. Past judgments from the Supreme Court cannot be universally applied as precedents for all cases, as the circumstances in each case may vary significantly. The previous rulings related to the deficiency of service by the Railway have established the following principles so far –

  • Facts must be established –theft, defective meal, bad condition of toilets or beds etc. or any other services.
  • Prove negligence on the part of railway.
  • Quantum and consequences of loss, damage and compensation to be proved with cogent evidence.

In the above case, neither the fact of theft could be established, nor was railway proved negligent in any manner. 

Earlier decided cases:

  • Case title -Union of India and Ors. Vs Sanjiv Dilsukhrai Dave and Anr. on 23 October 2002, (NC)

&

  • Deputy Chief Commercial Manager, Eastern Railways and Anr. v. Dr. K.K. Sharma and Ors., [200 (III) CPJ page 1 (NC)].

In both the aforementioned cases, Railways cited their respective rules as references or points of contention.

  • The jurisdiction to handle railway-related issues lies with the Railway Claims Tribunal, which is a State subject, as stated in Article 12 of the Directive Principles of State Policy. Consumer courts do not have authority in such matters.
  • Section 13 addresses any railway administration’s faults, and when combined with Section 15, it establishes that no other court shall handle cases related to Section 13 as railways have their own compensation system. This primarily pertains to cases involving freight, luggage, animals, and booked luggage.
  • The passenger is to take care of his own luggage and articles in accordance with Rule 506.2 of Indian Railway Conference Association (IRCA) No. 24, No. 216.
  •  The passenger is supposed to declare before the starting station and get any valuable articles insured by paying the necessary charges for the railway administration taking extra precautions as stated that under Rule 1301(I)(IV) of IPCA No. 24. 

Held-

  • Sections 13 and 15 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 did not take away the jurisdiction of the consumer commissions to decide the question of deficiency of service. 
  • It provides an additional remedy to a consumer. These sections bar civil court but not consumer commissions.
  • Circular dated 11.9.1998, Govt. of India, Ministry of Railway published some of the important duties.

Duties of TTE for Sleeper Coaches

  • He shall check the tickets of the passengers in the coach, guide them to their berth/seats and prevent unauthorised persons from the coach. He shall ensure that persons holding platform tickets, who came to see off or receive passengers do not enter the coach.
  • He shall inspect the passengers’ tickets while the train is in motion and present them as needed.
  • He shall ensure that the end doors of vestibule trains are kept locked between 22:00 and 6:00 hrs to prevent outsiders entering the coach.
  • He shall remain vigilant particularly during nighttime and ensure that intruders, beggars, hawkers and unauthorised persons do not enter the coach.
  • Sumatidevi M. Dhanwatay Respondent: Union of India And Ors.

 Date Of Judgment: 06/04/2004(SC)

Factual story: On 4th December 1991, a consumer boarded a 1st Class Air-conditioned berth on the Howrah-Bombay Mail train from Nagpur to Bombay. Her luggage contained valuable items, including gold, pearl, silver, diamond jewellery, and other valuables, amounting to a total value of Rs. 1,11,756. During her journey, she was assaulted by unauthorized passengers, who forcibly took away her gold, silver, pearl, diamond, and other valuable possessions.

Numerous individuals entered the compartment and caused extensive damage, breaking doors, window bars, glass panels, seating berths, and toilets. In response to the incident, the appellant pulled the alarm chain three times, leading to the train stopping at Igatpuri Station. There, she, along with other legitimate passengers, disembarked. She sought assistance and protection from the Railway Authorities but did not receive any help.

After arriving in Bombay, she lodged a complaint with the police concerning the entire incident. Following the complaint, the Maharashtra State Commission partially allowed the appellant’s claim and awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,41,756. Subsequently, the Railway administration filed an appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, arguing that they were helpless when an unruly mob entered the railway compartment and caused harm to the passengers and their property.

National commission reversed the order. SC observed- 

“Railway administration failed to take precaution and preventive measures. The appellant suffered injury and no protection or support was given to her. The total absence of any steps having taken by the concerned Railway Administration to mobilise adequate police force sufficiently beforehand when the occurrences of such mob-violence by ticketless travellers on stations enroute Nagpur to Bombay were to their prior knowledge”.

The above judgments make two things evident. To hold the Railways liable, both the theft and negligence on their part must be proven.

Questions and Answers September 2023

Questions and Answers September 2023

1. Rajesh (Practising advocate) Rajasthan, District Nagour 

Vehicle Burnt, total claim rejected for not filing FIR 

Please provide Case law for arguments?

Facts: Tractor /Vehicle got burnt at night ,informed Reliance Insurance Co. in the morning Company gave complaint Reference No  also 3116082678

Policy No 2601252343006331, Claim forms got signed 

Vehicle total loss claim rejected for the reason FIR not done with police or information to fire brigade. Surveyor named as Manish appointed after 18 months but survey never done.  

Case at argument stage at DCDRC, Nagour Rajasthan 

Please provide Case law for arguments?

Answer:

  1. No FIR required if no crime takes place or public loss in the incident
  2. IRDA Guidelines clear vide Circular dt 20.9.2011 vide their reference no –IRDA/HLTH/MISC/CIR/216/09/2011  

“the insured to intimate the company or submit the papers  within specific time is for the purpose of investigation, loss assessment etc. but this condition should not prevent genuine claims marely on technical grounds when delay is due to unavoidable circumstances”.

“insurer’s decision to reject the claim shall be based on sound logic and valid grounds, be noted such limitation clause does not work in isolation and is not absolute.” 

  1. IRDA (Protection of Policy Holders Interest)Regulations 2002

“Surveyor is supposed o sumit his reportwithin maximum of 6 months anf insurance company is supposed to take decision on claim within 30 days of receipt of surveyor report’

  1. Case Law: the Sikka Papers Limited V National Insurance Company Ltd.111 (2009) CPJ 90 SC 

  Surveyor report is a very important document

“In the matters concerning insurance whether it is a matter related to vehicle insurance, an accidental case or general insurance of house, factory or even insurance of goods on the way through carrier. Surveyor report is a very important document and ordinarily it cannot be challenged. Surveyor is an authorised agent of insurance companies who conducts survey of the spot, investigate the incident, evaluates loss and communicate to insurance company about the loss payable to the insured as per rules with its report’’ 

2. Nalin Kumar (Ph 8076462008) ku.nalin@rediffmail.com 

Bharti Exa Life Insurance Co. 

Question: What will happen to my execution petition heard on 28.9.23 and notice to party for compliance? 

Facts: Order in favour on 20.4.23 from Gurgaon DCDRC

Execution Application heard on 28.9.20 and notice for compliance 

Now one order from State Commission Panchkula to OP to file application for condonation of delay of 36 days .Implementation of order stayed 

Answer: Your execution order has been stayed because appeal has been filed but yet not admitted 

You need to contest their delay issue and if delay condoned, contest the case on merits .Execution petition will not be taken up now.

3. Mohammad Nadeem Mondol -Twitter Id Farya l0786

Question: Samsung phone purchased from flipcart 

Not functioning, service rejected saying purchase done on 5.9.1015

How can  get relief 

Answer: 

  1. Confirm your purchase date ,if in 2015 you are not entitled to free service or repair or refund if warrantee period of one year expired and no further AMC done 
  2. If you purchased within one year and make /model is of 2015,you have a case to plead you are given old model/phone .Receipt/purchase document  is a must in your case.

4. Dushyant Goutam 

Question: Return Rejected, (Product not mentioned) Unhappy with support system 

Facts :flipcart order OD42880334085351910 

Credit issued by IDFC bank without consent and forced to accept product  

EMI to be paid for CIBIL score 

Answer: If loan from bank, it’s your responsibility. You might have signed terms, no one forces to accept product if payment not made .Bank pays on your instruction only your grievance with product is different from Bank dealing 

Can check with flip cart for reason of return rejection, no cause given, no date of purchase. Hence cannot suggest, just follow the system provided for online purchase. 

5. Sandeep, Kaithal Haryana 

Question: Electricity bill ,Excesses billing issue 

Facts : Bill paid regularly for five years  .This time bill Rs 51200/-

Department says –Your bill was coming very less, now billed you on average basis.

Your meter is faulty, five years bill raised  

Status on bill always shown –F never informed about fault when meter reading taken.

Answer: Ask for inspection report which says meter faulty 

Ask for meter reading of all five years. If they don’t have meter reading, they cannot calculate for average billing also depending upon last six months bill before meter goes faulty 

As per section 56 of Electricity Act 2003, Department cannot raise bill for more than two years 

6. Guddu Kumar on behalf of mother Rohtas Sasaram Bihar 

Consumer Case No CC-44/2023 Ph 7776057735

My case before Commission, Date given as per the OP advocate, is it fair or a practice to see convenience of OP advocate

7. Anil Ramchanra Panat, Pune 

Question: Is it appropriate to include the Branch Manager and MD of Unity Small Finance Bank Ltd as individual parties in the dispute before the Consumer Commission?

Answer: For suits, claims, or complaints initiated by corporations, authorities, or units, they must be submitted under the name of an authorized individual. If an order is issued for compliance, a designated individual should be held accountable to represent the case and handle its submission or contestation.

Relevant Case Law- H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. Decided On 14th December 2018                                                                                  

Supreme Court as the case H.K. Singla Vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 11969 of 2018 Decided On 14th December 2018. 

The district court’s ruling established the responsibility of the secretary of the Chandigarh State Bank of Patiala Employees Co-operative USE Thrift & Credit Society to reimburse the complainant’s deposited sum along with interest. However, the secretary was not held personally accountable in the ruling. As a result, he could not be subjected to imprisonment under section 27 of the law because he was not named as an individual party or held personally liable on behalf of the society.

8. Ramprakash Tiwari, Jabalpur 

Complaint of Medical Negligence Against a Nursing Home 

Question: Can a Nursing Home deny the patient access to their medical information?

Answer: Mandatory and bound to provide all information related medical treatment, status and other related issues.

Case Law Jothi against State, Department of Health and Family Welfare & others

While deciding the allegation of not providing information to patient, Court held:

“When a patient enters a government hospital, he or she is examined first. The symptoms are recorded. The condition is noted. Scan or X-ray is taken. A diagnosis is made. Treatment is prescribed. Medicines (if available!!) are given. Every stage will have to be contemporaneously and accurately recorded. In the case of inpatients, discharge summary should contain all the relevant particulars. We have moved into the digital age. It should therefore not be difficult to store all the information in the digital mode. A patient is entitled to be furnished all the relevant records pertaining to his or her treatment. This right can be effectuated only if the information is stored digitally. Proper maintenance of record is an integral part of the medical services.

9. Sachin Kumar Singh, Siliguri 

Question: Can I file case against school? 

The negligence of Sri Sri Academy, the school attended by my son Krishna Singh, resulted in him getting injured while participating in a dance activity at Shankar Vidya Mandir Foundation. In response to the situation, a teacher called upon a watchman who physically dragged my son to a restroom on the third floor.

I received a call notifying me of the incident a significant two hours after it happened. It took an additional three hours to arrange for transportation to a nursing home. Initially, the school owner had assured me that he would provide video footage of the dance and the incident. However, he later retracted this assurance, explaining that the IT department staff was on a week-long leave.

Consequently, I had to take my son to Max Super Speciality Hospital in Delhi, where he remains in the intensive care unit receiving treatment. He is currently battling a traumatic condition known as Transverse Myelitis with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).

Answer: You have the option to file a case regarding the school’s failure to provide proper services. The delay in providing information exacerbated the damage that could have been minimized had it been addressed promptly. It is distressing that your child was not given proper care and was instead left to fend for themselves by being sent to a restroom.

The strength of your case hinges on whether the diagnosed condition was pre-existing and known to you or not. The Supreme Court has ruled in several instances that schools fall under the purview of the Consumer Protection Act. In a landmark case, a three-judge bench in Osmania Islamic Academy v. State of Karnataka, delivered a comprehensive judgment on August 14, 2003. The court held that students are considered consumers, acknowledging that education is a service. The judgment thoroughly examines all aspects covered by educational institutions in delivering education to students.

Bhupesh Khurana v Buddha Dental College & hospital Judgment dated on 13 February 2009 Civil Appeal No.1135 of 2001  

SC again in Civil Appeal No 3504 of 2020 (Manu Solanki and Others vs Vinayaka Mission University), the issue as to whether education is a service within the Consumer Protection Act, is pending before the Supreme Court.

 “Since there are divergent views of this Court bearing on the subject as to whether an educational institution or University would be subject to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, the appeal would require admission. Admit,” 

10. Ghasiram Bag Noupada, Odisha 

Question: Is it possible for me to approach the Consumer Forum to file a complaint against both a government hospital and a private hospital? The patient was initially treated at the government hospital, where negligence occurred, and subsequently, they were transferred to a private hospital in a critical condition. Unfortunately, despite receiving treatment at the private hospital, the patient passed away.

Answer: You are considered a consumer according to the Consumer Protection Act if you have made payments for the services you’ve availed. Although government hospitals typically offer free services, if they have private rooms or charge specific individuals while not imposing charges on you, you fall within the realm of being a consumer.

V.Shantha V/S Indian medical association 1995 SC set the criteria –

  • When Govt hospital run with the funds of govt and doctors are employees, you are not a consumer.
  • When Govt. hospital is run by Govt but some private arrangement is separately done and services are given by charging fee, you are a consumer even when you have not paid any thing.  

Case Law Dr Hema, Dr Sulekha Dr Sethunath v/s S.Jayan & Others .11(2016) CPJ 306 NC National Commission has held that complainant do not fall within purview of consumer under the Consumer Protection Act.

11. Shubhit 9311234306

Question; Want to file case against Builder .Agreement done at Lucknow, I am residing in Delhi .Jurisdiction of which Consumer Commission?

Answer: New Act has made the provision that complaint can be filed at the place where consumer has work place or residence. No matter where OP has workplace, offices or residence  

  1. (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the District Commission shall have

Jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as

Consideration does not exceed one crore rupees:

Provided that where the Central Government deems it necessary so to do, it may

prescribe such other value, as it deems fit.

(2) A complaint shall be instituted in a District Commission within the local limits of

whose jurisdiction,—

(a) the opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than

one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, ordinarily resides or carries on

business or has a branch office or personally works for gain; or

(b) any of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the

institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business or

has a branch office, or personally works for gain, provided that in such case the

permission of the District Commission is given; or

(c) the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises; or

(d) the complainant resides or personally works for gain.

12. Mukleshwar Garnayakfrom Odisha 

Question: Date of Birth Issue 

Date of Birth on Adhar card and 10th certificate are the same but actual date of birth is not this, do not have birth certificate also .How will it affect with New Birth rules.

Answer: New Birth and Death (Amendment) Act is applicable from 1st 0ctober 2023.

Henceforth from 1st October, birth certificate shall be required for admission in schools, issuance of driving licence, preparation of voter list Adhhar number registration of marriage appointment to the Govt jobs. 

But those who already have school certificate or adhar cards or licence etc, those will stand valid. 

Use of birth certificate: The Bill requires the use of birth and death certificates to prove the date and place of birth for persons born on or after this Bill comes into effect.  The information will be used for purposes including: (i) admission to an educational institution, (ii) preparation of voter lists, (iii) appointment to a government post, and (iv) any other purpose determined by the central government.

Ref Section 13of the Act 

“(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the certificate referred to in sub-section (2) or section 12, shall be used to prove the date and place of birth of a person who is born on or after the date of commencement of the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Act, 2023, for the purposes of—

 (a) admission to an educational institution; 

(b) issuance of a driving licence; 

(c) preparation of a voter list; 

(d) registration of a marriage;

 (e) appointment to a post in the Central Government or State Government or a local body or public sector undertaking or in any statutory or autonomous body under the Central Government or State Government; 

(f) issuance of a passport;

 (g) issuance of an Aadhaar number;

13. Priyanka from Bangluru (Name Annonimus)

Question: Promised to give admission as irregular student in Bhuwan College Bengaluru Rajiv Gandhi Institute. Session 2022-2023. Admission not given, exams not allowed in spite of payments throughout the academic session (2022-2023) in instalments for every term. Total paid   Rs 1,79000/-She has come from chhatisgad to Bengaluru for job, cannot do regular course. First Rs 30000/- given to college but thereafter to the account employee of college gave with a promise to get admission 

Answer: Appears case of misleading and abstracting money .May be could not or was not possible to get admission as irregular student.

  • Can File FIR for cheating 
  • Write to institute the events took place and can get 30,000/- paid without admission 
  • File consumer case making college /institute party stating their employee mislead amounts to deficiency in services 

14. Sachin Goutam  @sachingoutamseo

Govt advocate appointed, case for mobile to be filed nothing done for last two months .What to do?

Answer: Contact Legal Services Authority where you applied for and got Govt. advocate, complain for the same 

15. @Sanatgarnayak4386

Question: Student of BSc 2nd year Have no birth certificate but on records it is 2003 which is correct .As per new rules, for everything birth certificate required 

Answer: as above reply to question 2

Use of birth certificate: The Bill requires the use of birth and death certificates to prove the date and place of birth for persons born on or after this Bill comes into effect. (1st October 2023)

16. @struggleworld4132

Question: Two shops in my house, electricity bill comes on one meter only Department disconnected supply and imposed Rs 34000/- bill

Answer: you are using domestic meter for commercial use .This is unauthorised use of electricity as per section 126/135 of Electricity Act 2003. Hence penal billing done. 

Get separate meter for shops, request department to give some rebate if you promise to follow the system. 

17. Venkateshan from Karnataka 

Question: OP not complying the order .If party goes to jail after NBW, how will I get relief 

Answer: Sending jail and fining for non-compliance of order will not dilute your right .OP will still have to pay your dues as ordered, it cannot be changed even if OP finishes his jail period

18. Guddu Kumar (Rohtas)Sasaram

Question: excess bill received after 20 months .took meter for checking to department ,got acknowledgment of meter given.Before court not appearing for two dates ,no WS given45 days are over. Can court refuse to take WS on next date? They say meter not received by them I have proof 

Notice to party-15.7.2023

Hearings -3.7.2023, 11.8.20231.9.2023, 12.9.2023

Answer: Yes, you give in writing to commission to close the defence of OP, and go ahead with your case and order on merits. 

Q n A Legal Desk

Q n A Legal Desk

1. Anil Ramchanra Panat from Pune 

Question: Whether it is right in making Branch Manager and MD of Unity Small Finance Bank Ltd a party to the dispute before  the Consumer Commission in their individual capacity?

Answer: In cases of suits/claims/complaints filed by the corporate, authorities or units, they are to be filed through name and person authorized by the authority. The order if passed for compliance ,some live person is to be made responsible through whom case is filed or contested. 

Relevant Case Law  H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. Decided On 14th December 2018

H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors. Decided On 14th December 2018 who had filed a complaint against secretary Chandigarh State Bank of Patiala Employees Co-operative USE Thrift & Credit Society, claiming maturity amount along with interest on his deposit with the Society

Supreme Court as the case H.K. Singla Vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 11969 of 2018 Decided On 14th December 2018 

  1. District court in its order fixed the liability of secretary, Chandigarh State Bank of Patiala Employees Co-operative USE Thrift & Credit Society, to repay the deposited amount with interest to the complainant but did not make secretary liable in his individual capacity. Hence he could not be imprisoned under section 27 of the act in the absence of he made party by name or on behalf of society fixing personal liability.

2. Ramprakash Tiwari from Jabalpur 

Question :Whether nursing home can refuse medical information of patient to him?

Answer: Mandatory and bound to provide all information related medical treatment,status and other related issues 

Case Law Jothi against State ,Department of Health and Family Welfare & others

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by one Jothi against State ,Department of Health and Family Welfare & others Represented by the Secretary, before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court Decided On decided on 31.07.2023 praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents1 to 4 to take appropriate action upon the respondents for their negligent act incurring death to a new born child of the petitioner

While deciding the allegation of not providing information to patient ,Court held :

“When a patient enters a government hospital, he or she is examined first. The symptoms are recorded. The condition is noted.Scan or X-ray is taken. A diagnosis is made. Treatment is prescribed.Medicines (if available!!) are given. Every stage will have to be contemporaneously and accurately recorded. In the case of inpatients, discharge summary should contain all the relevant particulars. We have moved into the digital age. It should therefore not be difficult to store all the information in the digital mode. A patient is entitled to be furnished all the relevant records pertaining to his or her treatment.This right can be effectuated only if the information is stored digitally.Proper maintenance of record is an integral part of the medicalservices.

3. Sachin Kumar Singh Siliguri 

Question: Negligence by School (Sri Sri Academy) son Krishna Singh  got injured while dancing in the academy run by Ravi Shankar Vidya Mandir Foundation. The watchman took him to third floor rest room dragging him physically. I got call 2 hrs later after the incident and they took more 3 hrs for arranging a vehicle for the nursing home. Owner of the school earlier said he will share me video of the incident but later refused stating that staff of IT department went on leave for 7 days. I brought my son to Max Super speciality hospital Delhi and s still in ICU under treatment. Can I file case against the school? My son is suffering from traumatic Condition Trasverse Myelities with GBS.

Answer : You can file case of deficiency in services against school for delaying information which caused more damage than it could be if brought immediately. Painful thing that he was not attended with care and left to mercy of god by sending to rest room. 

Merit of the case depends on the fact whether diagnosed disease was pre-existing, known or not known to you.

Student is a consumer as per Supreme court three judges Bench in the case of Osmania Islamic Academy v / s State of Karnataka, three judges bench comprising Justice V N Khare, Justice S N Variyavaha and Chief Justice K G Blaakrishnana pronounced a detailed order on 14.8.2003 held that education is a service by discussing every aspect covered by the educational institute in providing education to the students.

Following this order, again there was Supreme Court ruling in the year 2009 in the matter of Bhupesh Khurana v Buddha Dental College & hospital Judgment dated on 13 February, 2009 Civil Appeal No.1135 of 2001  holding college unfair for their misleading information about the college

SC again in Civil Appeal No 3504 of 2020 (Manu Solanki and Others vs Vinayaka Mission University), the issue as to whether education is a service within the Consumer Protection Act, is pending before the Supreme Court.

A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee ,  Civil Appeal No 3504 of 2020 (Manu Solanki and Others vs Vinayaka Mission University), has admitted an appeal filed by Manu Solanki and other students of a medical course against Vinayaka Mission University at Salem in Tamil Nadu, alleging deficiency in services.
“Since there are divergent views of this Court bearing on the subject as to whether an educational institution or University would be subject to the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, the appeal would require admission. Admit,” 

4. Ghasiram Bag Noupada ,Odisha 

Question: Can I go to the Consumer forum against Government Hospital along with private hospital?

Answer: You are a consumer under consumer protection act if paid money for the services hired. Government hospitals generally give free services but in case they are having some private rooms or charging from some but have not charged from you ,you become a consumer.

V.Shantha V/S Indian medical association 1995 SC set the criteria –

  • Private Hospitals. Private Nursing homes are service providers when they charge from patient and you are a consumer 
  • Charitable clinics /hospital also are run by some persons other than you  donating funds ,hence are service providers and you are a consumer 
  • When your fee is paid by your employer or insurance but not by you, you are a consumer 
  • When Govt hospital run with the funds of govt and doctors are employees, you are not a consumer .
  • When Govt. hospital is run by Govt but some private arrangement separately done and services are given by charging fee ,you are a consumer even when you have not paid any thing  

Dr Hema, Dr Sulekha Dr Sethunath v/s S.Jayan & Others .11(2016) CPJ 306 NC National Commission has held that complainant do not fall within purview of consumer under Consumer Protection Act. Here was the question of making payment for the services hired and a Government hospital SAT Hospital not charging from the patients ,hence are not rendering services to the consumers under Consumer Protection Act. In this case, Sat Hospital is a Govt. Hospital, who had not charged from the patient and had not been charging from any other patient for the treatment .A Child Patient was brought to the causality on 11.10.2000, was kept in ICU. After one week from admission, surgery was conducted at the left hand and ultimately resulted into amputation of a portion of left forearm. It was alleged that post operation care was not given to the child as the child developed gangrene due to the negligence of the doctors .

Joint complaint & Class action are not the same, but both are accepted: Re-confirms SC

Joint complaint & Class action are not the same, but both are accepted: Re-confirms SC

Joint complaint & Class action are not the same, but both are accepted: Re-confirms SC

According to the Supreme Court’s order, the necessity of applying Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arises only in cases where a plaintiff represents the general public, specifically in complaints filed under Section 12(1)(c) of the 1986 Act. This rule does not apply when complainants in a similar position collectively file a complaint seeking identical relief. In such cases, there is no requirement to comply with Order I Rule 8 CPC since these complainants do not represent others, especially when there is no broader public interest involved. These complainants are seeking relief for themselves and nothing more.

Dr Prem Lata, Legal Head VOICE

  • Case title: Alpha G184 Owners Association V/S M/S Magnum International Trading Company Pvt. Ltd.
  • A. No.-004718 / 2022
  • Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari, Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
  • Decided 15 May 2023

Factual background

A construction company, against whom home buyers filed a consumer complaint before the National Commission due to the non-completion of a project within the promised timeframe, has once again sparked controversy. The builder argued that the current complaint is not valid for two reasons.

  • Complaint is not filed in the capacity of representation by someone under Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 where public interest is involved.
  • Complaint of the association was not maintainable because the registration of the association of allottees did not conform with the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, by-laws 2012 (HRRS Act).

The builder submitted an affidavit to the national commission, informing them that the matter mentioned in the writ petition is currently awaiting a decision from the High Court of Haryana. As a result, the national commission postponed the proceedings sine die.

Here is an appeal against the order of National commission.   

SC after going through the details observed:

“The need for the application of Order I Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”), which speaks of a plaintiff representing the other public as a whole would be required only in a case involving a complaint under Section 12(1)(c) of the 1986 Act. In other words, it does not have any application when similarly placed complainants jointly make a complaint seeking the very same relief. In such a case, there is no question of Order I Rule 8 CPC being complied with as they do not represent the others, particularly when there is no larger public interest involved. Such complainants seek reliefs for themselves and nothing beyond.”

Court further held “a pedantic and hyper-technical approach would cause damage to the very concept of consumerism”.

On the second point of eligibility of association to file complaint Court noted

“That the issue of registration and byelaws of the association had no relevance in the proceedings before the Commission in light of the fact that individual affidavits were filed, the complaint would fall under Section 12(1)(a) (Manner in which complaint shall be made by a consumer) of the 1986 Act and that there was no need to go into the issue of whether the case would come under Section 12(1)(b) of the 1986 Act (Manner in which complaint shall be made by a consumer association.

“The 2019 Act facilitates the consumers to approach the forums by providing a very flexible procedure. It is meant to encourage consumerism in the country. Any technical approach in construing the provisions against the consumer would go against the very objective behind the enactment,” the Court observed.

The Apex Court directed the National Commission to expeditiously hear the matters on merits.

Earlier cases

The Class Action debate emerged during the Amrapali Sapphire Developers versus Amrapali Sapphire Flat Buyers Welfare Association case in 2019. In this case, 43 consumers collectively filed consumer complaints before the National Commission against Amrapali builders. The Flat Buyers Welfare Association had lodged the complaint in May 2016, citing a delay in the builder delivering possession of their flats. The builders contested the complaint by raising the following arguments.

  • Number of consumers cannot file cases together.
  • The pecuniary jurisdiction of Commission should be considered based on amount involved in each case separately.
  • RWA cannot be a complainant on behalf of residents.
  • The Supreme Court(SC) announced on that flat owners can now join hands and directly approach the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) against real estate developers for delay in handing over possession of their flats. Thereafter ‘Class Action’ theory was specifically brought in Consumer Protection Act 2019.

In this connection, the judgment referred to Brigade Enterprises Ltd. v. Anil Kumar Virmani (2021)which held that consumers having similar interests can file a joint complaint and that they need not file in a representative capacity.

Reference was also made to the recent decision National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harsolia Motors And Ors. 2023 (SC) 313, which advocated against adopting a technical approach in interpreting Consumer Protection Act

Important Class Action Case after new act 2019: Vikrant Singh Malik & 25 Ors.Versus Supertech Limited & 2 Ors (Through its M.D.)

Following the enactment of a new act, the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment on August 24, 2020 (SC) in a specific case, providing a comprehensive explanation of the Class Action theory. This landmark judgment is regarded as a guiding precedent for future cases involving Class Action. The case before the esteemed National Commission involved Vikrant Singh Malik & 25 Others versus Supertech Limited & 2 Others (Through its Managing Director), with the consumer case number 1290 of 2015.

The matter at hand revolved around the question of whether a complaint filed by 26 consumers who shared a common interest against the same builder in a housing matter could be accepted by the highest commission, considering that each complainant had a different status regarding their respective flats. All 26 consumers jointly submitted a complaint along with an application seeking permission to file a collective complaint. The filing of a joint complaint was based on the invocation of Section 2(1) (c) in conjunction with 2(1) (b) (IV) of the Act 86.

National Commission made two major observations:

  1. That there was variation of facts of each homebuyer about the allotment of their flat such as –
  • Apartment Distinct
  • Date of Buyer agreement different
  • Date of execution of agreement different
  • Price of flat different
  • Area of flat different
  1. Frame of complaint, nature of pleadings and relief sought is not fit to be called ‘class action’.  
  • Only seeks to highlight the grievance of 26 complaints whereas some other consumers having same grievance had settled the matter with builder.
  • Complaint does not possess the character of representative for all having the common interest which is the essential element of section 2(i)(c) and then could refer to section 13(6).

NCDRC dismissed the complaint in entirety, giving liberty to the complainants to file individual complaints before the appropriate forum. Matter now comes before the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court observes-

  • A complaint filed by all the consumers with the relief for the benefit of all consumers is maintainable.
  • Regarding factually different cost, size, booking date and price variation, Supreme court refers to full bench order in the matter of Ambrish Kumar Shukla v/s Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (2017) NC wherein the issue was explained in detail by giving example.

If a developer has sold 100 flats in a project out of which 25 are three-bedroom flats, 25 are two-bedroom flats and 50 are one-bedroom flats and failed to deliver timely possession, all the allotees irrespective of size shall have common grievance against the builder. Hence a complaint filed by all the consumers with the relief for the benefit of all consumers is maintainable under section 2(1) (c) of the act. Hence, Complainants could file a joint complaint if there is an element of sameness of the interest.

  • Complaint needs to be modified to make it Class Acton

The complaint lacks the collective representation of all the consumers involved. Furthermore, the facts indicate that some of the homebuyers have already resolved their issues with the builder and taken possession of their properties. Consequently, the complaint in its current form is not admissible and needs to be modified. Considering that the objective of the act is to protect consumer welfare, the National Commission for Dispute Resolution (NCDRC) can reconsider its decision to dismiss the complaint entirely, especially when the common interest among the complainants is clearly evident. Additionally, the issue can be examined since the advocate representing the complainants has requested permission to amend the complaint.

 Hence law laid down by Supreme Court for “Class Action” character as a consumer complaint thus stands as hereunder-

  • There should be an element of sameness of the interest and with common interest of all the consumers joining together.
  • The complaint should be represented by one leading case for protection of interest & benefit of all the consumers.
  • Factually different cost, size, booking date and price variation will not affect the character of “class action” against the same party with the same objective held by the Supreme Court.
  • The content of the complaint must also not be a single party centric. It should speak for all the consumers.

The Supreme Court has remanded the complaint back to the National Commission for Dispute Resolution (NCDRC) to reconsider its decision of dismissing the complaint entirely. This demonstrates that the court adopts a highly flexible approach, favouring consumers based on the specific facts and circumstances of each individual case.

An error in procedure makes an order Null & Void

An error in procedure makes an order Null & Void

An error in procedure makes an order Null & Void

Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Forum reversed an order made by the Gautam Buddha Nagar District Consumer Forum, which had sentenced Ritu Maheshwari, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), to one month in prison. Maheshwari was found guilty of not complying with a directive issued by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in 2014.

Observation;

It was observed by State Commission that District Commission’s order “defective” because it failed to give GNIDA an opportunity to present its side of the case. Consumer Commissions to follow the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) when exercising powers under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act. I.e. issue notice, after notice bailable warrants, non-boilable warrants and then declaring absconding &punishment

Case title: Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority vs Mahesh Mitra

Appeal Execution Application No. AEA/1/2023

Decided on 24 June 2023

Other similar case of resulting into dismissal of complaint:

It’s the most painful thing for a consumer who wins the case after putting all efforts, energy and time and it becomes null and void due to an error in understanding the real person who is to be punished. It happened with a complainant in the matter of H.K. Singla vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors.Decided On 14th December 2018 who had filed a complaint against secretary Chandigarh State Bank of Patiala Employees Co-operative USE Thrift & Credit Society, claiming maturity amount along with interest on his deposit with the Society

As per the practice under law, in cases of suits/claims/complaints filed by the corporate, authorities or units, they are to be filed through name and person authorized by the authority under the document of power of attorney to sign the documents etc. Further it needs to be supported by resolution passed in an individual’s favour to deal with specific case by virtue of holding power of attorney from the authority.

Facts:

  1. District consumer court passed an order in favour of consumer directing the society to pay the maturity amount with interest @10% per annum along with compensation to the tune of rupees ten thousand to the complainant
  2. Since society had gone in liquidation ,they went in appeal before the state commission .State commission Chandigarh dismissed the appeal finding no error in the district consumer forum order &order is to be complied
  3. Now complainants comes back to the consumer forum for execution of the order under section 27 of the act .and District forum in the absence of payment of decrial amount, orders two years imprisonment and rupees 5000/- fine .
  4. Aggrieved by this order, respondent again goes to the State commission for staying the order of imprisonment. State commission passed an interim order staying the operation of order of imprisonment subject to payment of decrial amount within eight weeks.
  5. Defendants failed to comply this order also and they filed appeal against the order of State commission before the National commission .National commission confirmed all the orders of lower courts below dated 08.11.2012 passed in First Appeal Nos.652/12; 653/12; 654-656/12; 657/12 It was held by the National Commission that district forum rightly ordered for imprisonment under section 27 of the act for non-compliance of its order, State commission rightly gave an opportunity to the opposite party to pay the decrial amount within specific period and conditionally stayed the operation of imprisonment. With this observation, National Commission dismissed the appeal holding all orders passed by the lower commissions correct
  6. Supreme Court as the case H.K. Singla Vs. Avtar Singh Saini & Ors.[Civil Appeal No. 11969 of 2018 Decided On 14th December 2018
  7. District court in its order fixed the liability of secretary, Chandigarh State Bank of Patiala Employees Co-operative USE Thrift & Credit Society, to repay the deposited amount with interest to the complainant but did not make secretary liable in his individual capacity. Hence he could not be imprisoned under section 27 of the act in the absence of he made party by name or on behalf of society fixing personal liability.
  8. State commission while staying the order of imprisonment in 2013 with condition to pay the decrial amount did nothing to correct the error though this interim order continued from time to time. It was the State commission to decide there and then as to whether any order for jail can be passed against the society for non –compliance of the order
  9. National commission also did not interfere in the order passed below but did not specify whom to send to jail under section 27 of the act
  10. Under the circumstances Supreme Court suspended the order of the district forum to the extent of imprisonment of secretary of the society
  11. This is also observed that society has gone in liquidation and liquidator has been appointed, complainant is given liberty to take necessary steps to recover the decrial amount as ordered by the district court in accordance with law

Related

Enquire Now

Form is temporarily not available. Please visit our contact page.
X
Enquire Now